Translational approaches for bone construct
Background
Short-term preclinical research should focus on cell growth, cell carriers, scaffolds and other biomaterials, growth factors that enhances bone growth in experimental settings, development 3D printable osteogenic or osteoconductive constructs, or assessing relevant bio-physiological aspects for cell maintenance in bio material, e.g. vascular components, stem cell properties,mechanics, magnets/ easy electricity, and bioreactors. The results should be applicable for clinical studies.
The mid-term aim is to start bone defect repair studies using bone substitute biomaterials in non-malignant diseases (non-irradiated tissues). Targets are mandibular defect repair using bone regeneration technology with scaffolds and/ or CAD – CAM reconstruction (plates and scaffolds).
The research topic needs to be either translational (nonclinical / preclinical) or clinical.The long-term goal is the intra operative reconstruction of facial bone defect using 3D printable bone substitute material. It includes areas like cell preparation techniques, intra operative reconstruction methods, TERM, custom-made scaffold printing and customized (tissue engineered) free flaps
Research questions
The use of bone tissue engineering for facial bone defect repair with regards to the clinical outcome of orthopedic, oral and maxillofacial procedures is not well established. Despite clear development of CAD-CAM technology in medicine and regenerative medicine in surgery, modern facial reconstructive surgery will not be possible without focused high quality, multispecialty research both on a translational and clinical level.
For example:
- What are optimal materials and/or bone substitute materials for additive manufacturing (CAD—CAM) for scaffolds, matrices and implants?
- What are the critical stages in CAD-CAM process in medicine?
- Are cells necessary in implantable bone substitute material?
- What are the relevant stages in bone defect repair and direct (digital) manufacturing technologies in clinical settings?
AO CMF Funded Research Projects
Have a look at the latest funded projects under the Translational approaches for bone construct research topic
Our central hypothesis is that treatment with PSVEGF+BMP6+SAG is superior to Infuse bone graft with regard to CF bone regeneration. To test this we will create 5 mm critical-sized segmental defects in rat mandibles and treat them with: rigid fixation only; fixation with Infuse bone graft; fixation with nude PS scaffold; fixation with PSSAG; fixation with PSBMP6+SAG; and fixation with PSBMP6+VEGF+SAG. We will assess bony regeneration using radiography, micro-CT, histology and mechanical strength testing.
We are developing a liposomal formulation of recombinant human WNT3A protein that is intended to enhance the osteogenic properties of xenogeneic bone graft substitutes used in craniomaxillofacial reconstructive surgery.
Degenerative alveolar ridge changes are an inevitable part of aging, which also predictably occur following tooth loss, craniomaxillofacial trauma, periodontal disease, or tumor surgery. The resulting degenerative changes in skeletal structure and facial esthetics can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life. Alveolar ridge reconstruction procedures may be performed with autologous bone graft, bone substitutes, or combinations thereof but a range of early and late complications, coupled with extensive and rapid resorption result in a high failure rate 1,2. We are developing a pro-osteogenic human WNT3A protein therapeutic e.g., ART352-L for use in humans. We hypothesize that a combination of ART352-L with a xenograft material will result in robust, persistent vertical augmentation that will ultimately provide optimum esthetics and long-term implant stability.
To test this hypothesis, in Year 1 we will use a Wnt reporter strain of mice coupled with the development of a new alveolar ridge augmentation procedure to determine whether a combination of ART325-L and xenograft (Bio-Oss) results in significantly greater vertical volume of new bone compared to a xenograft alone. We have considerable experience with murine models of oral surgery including periosteal tunneling 3, xenografting 4, autografting 5-7, and implant osseointegration 8-14, therefore we anticipate being successful in developing this murine model. In Year 2, we will test whether the osteogenic effect elicited by ART352-L+xenograft material is on par or superior to the use of an autograft. In Year 3, we will demonstrate that the rate of bone resorption in the ART325-L+xenograft group is lower than the rate of bone resorption observed with the use of an autograft. If treatment with ART352-L enhances the osteogenic potential of xenograft material as expected, then the success of surgical procedures to increase vertical alveolar bone height would be increased, and their attendant complications would significantly decrease. Collectively, these pivotal studies will form the foundation for a clinical application of ART352-L to enhance vertical ridge reconstruction that has a direct benefit to an at-risk, elderly patient population.
PUBLICATION:
Chen J, Yuan x, Lib Z, Bahat DJ, Helms J.A.: Bioactivating a bone substitute accelerates graftincorporation in a murine model of vertical ridgeaugmentation, dental materials 36 (2020)1303–1313, doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.06.003