April 16, 2016

Colibri II - Power For Spine 

Philip Horsting, Jean Ouellet

media-109579

The Expedium 5.5 Power Instrument Set is designed to augment the current instrument set for the Expedium 5.5 implant family of products in three main areas:

  • Enhanced surgeon ergonomics and health
  • Speed and efficiency
  • Safety and accuracy

Enhanced surgeon ergonomics and health

It is a well-known fact that spinal deformity surgeries are long procedures with repetitive forceful maneuvers often in a less than ideal ergonomic position. Such repetitive tasks lead to chronic overuse injury. Auerbach [1] quantified the type of work-related injuries that spine surgeons experienced over their careers (Table 1).

The conclusion that can be derived from research such as in Table 1 is that compared with disease estimates in the general population, spine surgeons have a higher prevalence of MSDs.

The instrument length in the Expedium 5.5 Power Instrument Set is designed to improve surgeon ergonomics and provides a more comfortable shoulder and torso positioning during surgical procedures. Additionally, the powered hand piece reduces the number of repetitive motions that can lead to surgeon fatigue or overuse injuries.

Improving ergonomics as well as decreasing the repetitive motions of the upper extremity would indeed improve the health of operating clinicians.
There is a growing need for surgeons to adapt their practice to incorporate better ergonomics. This can be achieved with good training programs and attaining a good understanding of the risks and benefits of using power in spine surgery.

media-109587
Table 1 Operating clinicians at the Scoliosis Research Society were surveyed to assess the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among spine surgeons. The most common self-reported diagnoses included: neck pain/strain/spasm (38%, 215/561), lumbar disc herniation/radiculopathy (31%, 172/561), cervical disc herniation/ radiculopathy (28%, 155/561), rotator cuff disease (24%, 134/561), varicose veins or peripheral edema (20%, 112/561), and lateral epicondylitis (18%, 99/561). Among active spine surgeons, multiple linear regression analysis revealed that total caseload correlated with neckpain (P = 0.01) and lower extremity edema (P = 0.03), while the number of deformity cases correlated with wrist pain (P =0.003) and hand pain (P = 0.03). Age was correlated with shoulder (P = 0.03), elbow (P = 0.04), and hand pain (P = 0.02).

Speed and efficiency

The application of powered instruments also offers potential timesaving for each screw implant. The greatest cumulative benefit is expected during deformity procedures.
 

Safety and accuracy

The power hand piece is designed to facilitate steadier hand positioning during pedicle preparation and screw delivery, potentially reducing the off-axis motion associated with manual pedicle preparation and screw delivery.

Seehausen [2] showed that the use of power tools to create pedicle tracts and place pedicle screws was associated with shorter fluoroscopy times and a lower revision rate compared with using manual tools. He showed that both techniques posed similar low risks of injury to the patient.

Power drilling also guarantees high accuracy of the navigation system
as low downward forces are applied to the spine.
 

Comparison of surgeon posture using manual and powered instruments

During pedicle preparation and screw delivery, powered instrumentation allows the surgeon to maintain a low shoulder position, an elbow position close to the torso, and decreases the amount of lateral bending often seen when using manual instrumentation (Figs 1 and 2). Maintaining alignment to the torso while minimizing the extension of the
upper extremities provides an opportunity to reduce muscle recruitment and surgeon fatigue. Similarly, using powered instruments reduces the number of repetitive motions required during spine surgery, reducing energy expenditure and decreasing the potential for musculoskeletal disorders associated with overuse [1].

media-109563
Fig 1a-b Comparison of shoulder height and elbow position: a Manual; b Powered instruments.
media-109571
Fig 2a-b Comparison of spine lateral bend and elbow lift: a Manual; b Powered instruments.

References

  1. Auerbach JD , Weidner ZD, Milby AH, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders among spine surgeons-results of a survey of the Scoliosis Research Society Membership. Spine. 2011 Dec; 36(26):e17151721.
  2. Seehausen DA, Skaggs DL, Andras LM, et al. Safety and efficacy of powerassistedpedicle tract preparation and  screw  placement. Spine Deformity. 2015 March;3(2):159165.

“approved by AO Technical Commission” and “approved by AO Foundation”
The brands and labels “approved by AO Technical Commission” and “approved by AO Foundation”, particularly "AO" and the AO logo, are AO Foundation's intellectual property and subject to trademark applications and registrations, respectively. The use of these brands and labels is regulated by licensing agreements between AO Foundation and the producers of innovation products obliged to use such labels to declare the products as AO Technical Commission or AO Foundation approved solutions. Any unauthorized or inadequate use of these trademarks may be subject to legal action.