Acute combined ACL–MCL in the elite female footballer—a playbook

BY DR DANIEL GÜNTHER

Acute combined ACL–MCL in the elite female footballer—a playbook

When you are called to see a professional footballer after a knee injury, the stakes are high. The athlete worries about her career, the club worries about its investment, and I as the surgeon worry about giving her the best possible chance to return to play without compromise. Not long ago, I treated a 24-year-old player from the Bundesliga who went down with a classic valgus–external rotation trauma. By the time she arrived in my department her knee was swollen, range of motion restricted, and everyone around her was anxious for answers.

Here, I review the case in five steps with learnings and reflection on the outcome. I summarized also the main practical tips and pitfalls highlighted by the case.

  • Read the quick summary
    • Dr Daniel Günther discusses managing combined ACL–MCL tears in elite female footballers.
    • Early ACL recon with quad tendon + MCL refixation + LET leads to stable return to play.
    • Surgeons gain practical pearls on graft choice, anchor placement, and tailored rehab.
    • Questions remain on LET indications and long-term outcomes of quad vs BTB grafts.
       

Disclaimer: The article represents the opinion of individual authors exclusively and not necessarily the opinion of AO or its clinical specialties.


Practical tips:

  1. Always examine in extension and flexion. If instability is present in both, think complete MCL complex rupture.
  2. Save the hamstrings. Use quad or BTB in combined ACL–MCL.
  3. Complete tibial MCL injuries behave like Stener lesions. They almost never heal well without surgery.
  4. Fluoro is your friend. Anchor malposition is the #1 avoidable cause of stiffness or recurrent instability.
  5. Vancomycin soak is cheap insurance. I haven’t had a graft infection since making it routine.
  6. Rehab is not ACL rehab. Protect the MCL. Lock down ROM early, then progress slowly.

 

Common pitfalls:

  1. Taking hamstrings on the injured side, you weaken the knee’s backup stabilizers.
  2. Ignoring the POL—if extension instability is present, you must address posterior fibers.
  3. Over-tightening the LET—will restrict rotation and irritate the lateral joint. Always fix in neutral rotation.
  4. Brace unlocked too soon—leads to medial side stretching.

 

1. First impressions and clinical exam—know what to look for

On clinical examination, the story unfolded as expected but with a few key details that changed everything. In full extension the knee was unstable. In 20 to 30 degrees of flexion, it was unstable again. The Lachman test showed a clear difference compared to the opposite side, and the pivot shift was positive. These findings told me that I was not dealing with a partial tear or an isolated lesion.

The MCL is not one uniform band; it is a complex of structures with different fibers tightening at different angles. When a patient is unstable in both extension and slight flexion, the entire medial complex is compromised—the superficial anterior and posterior bundles, the deep MCL, and the posterior oblique ligament. 

This was the situation here, and it set the stage for my treatment strategy.

 

2. Imaging confirms the diagnosis

The MRI confirmed what I suspected clinically. The ACL was completely ruptured, and the MCL showed a tibial-side lesion—essentially a Stener-like configuration.

Experience has taught that these tibial-side injuries do not heal reliably without surgical intervention. A femoral detachment may surprise us with good healing potential, but tibial avulsions rarely do. So, at this point, my mind was already turning toward operative management rather than conservative care.

 

3. Choosing the graft—and why I save the hamstrings

Selecting the graft for ACL reconstruction is always a discussion in its own right, and in this case it was decisive. Many surgeons would instinctively reach for the hamstrings, but I avoid that when the medial side is deficient. The reason is simple: the hamstrings act as secondary stabilizers of the medial knee. When valgus and MCL insufficiency are present, these muscles help hold things together. If I harvest them, I remove a valuable line of defense.

Instead, I favor the quadriceps tendon in such cases. It offers robust graft size, reliable fixation options, and it leaves the hamstrings intact to assist the healing medial structures. In a young female professional, preserving every bit of native stability is critical.

 

4. The operative sequence

Two days after the trauma, with tissue quality still good, we took her to surgery. I began with a diagnostic arthroscopy, which confirmed the ACL rupture and showed the classic drive-through sign on the medial side. The ACL was reconstructed with a quadriceps tendon autograft, soaked in vancomycin as I now routinely do. For fixation I prefer an adjustable loop on the femoral side and a hybrid construct on the tibia—a PEEK screw supported by a button. This combination gives me confidence that the graft will hold even under the stresses of an early return-to-play program.

Addressing the medial side required precision. I placed two anchors: one to secure the superficial MCL and one for the posterior oblique ligament. Intraoperative fluoroscopy guided me, because anchor malposition on the femur is one of the most common causes of stiffness or residual laxity after MCL repair. Correct placement makes all the difference between a knee that recovers full motion and one that struggles with tightness.

Because this was a young, high-demand athlete with a high-grade pivot shift, I also added a modified Lemaire procedure. Using a strip of iliotibial band, I kept the Kaplan fibers intact, shuttled the graft beneath the lateral collateral ligament, and fixed it proximal and posterior to its femoral insertion. This provides extra anterolateral stability without over-constraining the joint. The combination of ACL, MCL refixation, and LET may sound aggressive, but in this population, it is what keeps them on the field long-term.

 

Steps performed in the operative sequence

Surgery was scheduled 48 hours after the injury. Tissue quality was still good.

 

1. Diagnostic arthroscopy

  • Confirm ACL rupture, check menisci, and evaluate medial drive-through sign.

2. ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft

  • Harvest 8–9 mm ⌀ strip, soft-tissue only.
  • Vancomycin soak (I do this systematically now).
  • Femoral fixation: adjustable loop.
  • Tibial fixation: hybrid with PEEK screw + button (for extra security in young athletes).

3. MCL refixation

  • Tibial side was the culprit.
  • Two anchors: one for SMCL, one for POL.
  • Use intraoperative fluoroscopy to confirm anchor placement. Incorrect positioning is a recipe for stiffness or persistent laxity.

4. Modified Lemaire lateral tenodesis

  • Strip of iliotibial band, keeping Kaplan fibers intact.
  • Shuttled under lateral collateral ligament, fixed posterior–proximal to its femoral insertion.
  • Adds crucial rotational control for high-risk young females.

Post-op X-ray confirmed anchors and grafts in good position.

5. Rehabilitation protocol: protecting the medial side

The technical aspects of the surgery are only half the story; rehabilitation is just as decisive. Unlike an isolated ACL, where we push for early full weight-bearing and range of motion, a combined ACL–MCL repair demands more caution.

In the first three weeks, I limit flexion to 60 degrees and restrict weight-bearing to 20 kilograms with the brace locked. This gives the medial side a chance to heal without stretching out. From weeks four to six, I allow flexion up to 90 degrees and gradually increase the load, but the brace stays on. Only after six weeks do we progress toward full motion and start building strength more aggressively. If you forget that the MCL complex has been repaired and treat the patient as an isolated ACL, you run the risk of elongation, recurrent laxity, or stiffness.

 

6. Lessons to emphasize

Looking back at this case, I often share a few central lessons with colleagues and fellows. Preserving the hamstrings is not just a theoretical point; patients who lose that support after a medial injury are more likely to struggle. Protecting extension early is critical, because if the posterior fibers and POL are not shielded, you may never get them to heal properly. Vancomycin soaking has become part of my routine, and since adopting it I have not faced a graft infection.

There are also pitfalls I warn against. Taking the hamstrings on the injured side removes an important secondary stabilizer. Ignoring the posterior oblique ligament leaves extension instability unsolved.

Over-tightening the LET risks restricting rotation and irritating the lateral joint. And unlocking the brace too soon allows the medial side to stretch, undoing the repair. These are avoidable mistakes if you remain disciplined.

 

7. Outcome and reflection

At ten months, the player returned to Bundesliga training and competition. She had symmetric range of motion, a negative pivot shift, and most importantly, full confidence in her knee. Watching her take the field again was a reminder that these combined injuries, although complex and unforgiving, can be overcome with a structured plan.

My advice to colleagues is straightforward: let the clinical exam guide you, preserve what you can, repair what must be repaired, and never rush the rehabilitation. 

A combined ACL–MCL injury in a young professional footballer is not the time for half-measures. With thoughtful graft selection, precise medial repair, appropriate lateral augmentation, and careful rehabilitation, you can restore both stability and performance.

About the author:

Prof. Dr. Daniel Günther, MD, MHBA, FACS is an orthopaedic surgeon based in Germany with a subspecialty focus on sports knee injuries and complex ligament reconstructions. He serves as consultant and faculty for AO Sports, where he regularly teaches and publishes on advanced techniques for ACL, MCL, and multiligament surgery. Dr Günther has built a strong reputation for his work with elite athletes, particularly professional football players, and is recognised for combining evidence-based practice with pragmatic surgical strategies.

His clinical and research interests centre on graft selection, extra-articular augmentation, and rehabilitation protocols for high-demand patients. As an invited speaker at international meetings and a contributing author to consensus statements of the German Knee Society, he brings both academic expertise and hands-on surgical experience. Passionate about education, Dr Günther shares his cases and insights to help colleagues worldwide optimise outcomes for athletes facing career-defining injuries.

You might also be interested in...

AO Sport Advanced Course—Knee Injuries and Deformities

This course aims to present a broad perspective about the knee joint, emphasizing the concept of “the knee as an organ," where the synergistic interaction between soft tissues (ligaments, menisci, and cartilage) and bone is critical to promote optimal function.

Differences between male and female athlete sports injuries

Across the world, there has been an explosion in the number of girls and women engaging in sports traditionally considered male pursuits. Unsurprisingly, this has also led to a rise in new sports-related injuries. When it comes to treatment and prevention, the sexes are not the same.

Discover our videos and recorded webinars

In the AO Sports webinar series, leading faculty discuss a variety of issues and treatments. Simply register free to watch.